A Weekly Scientist Exclusive Report
By Mike Martin
The most striking thing about biologist Margie Profet (right)
used to be her unconventional theories about evolution and pregnancy,
conceived as she surfed the perilous waters of academe with neither
tenure track nor Ph.D.
Now, more than 15 years after she made headlines as a young scientific “It Girl,” the most striking things about Profet are how her life suddenly stopped and how the establishment she purportedly shunned has come forth, with praise, bewilderment, and sorrow.
Google
Profet's name and you'll see thousands of entries, debates,
conversations, and news, all but ending a few years ago. Unmarried, fit
and healthy, no reports of ill health or death have ever surfaced. No
out-of-sorts boyfriends or obsessive stalkers. No dangerous pursuits, at
least not involving life and limb.
So what happened to this anti-establishment thinker whose Sheryl Crow looks and beautiful mind made her a media darling?
No
one seems to know—not her family, not her friends, not her former
colleagues. All they know is that one day Margie Profet was at Harvard
University and the next day she wasn't. The prodigal prodigy vanished
into thin air, disappeared without a trace.
“Very sad," says U.C. Berkeley biochemist Bruce Ames,
who worked closely with Profet on some of her groundbreaking research.
“We tried desperately to find Margie a few years ago, but came up empty
handed,” Ames’ executive assistant Teresa Klask told me from the
Children's Hospital Oakland Research Institute, where Ames maintains a lab.
“As far as we know, she personally decided not to be found and we
unfortunately do not have any further information on her whereabouts.”
Harvard Medical School psychologist Deirdre Barrett planned to meet Profet in Cambridge, Mass. for an interview about her work. Though they spoke by phone several times, the meeting never happened. “I later realized that Margie had become quite isolated, almost reclusive,” Barrett told me. “She was battling some real psychological issues, and I sensed there were shadows at her back.”
Almost single-handedly recasting a trio
of everyday curses into a trinity of evolutionary blessings, Margie
Profet argued that menstruation, morning sickness, and allergies are
highly-adaptive protection mechanisms.
In a series of notable papers, she did what the best scientists do—overturn the conventional wisdom with insightful thinking and rigorous defense. (Click the paper GIF images to enlarge).
In a series of notable papers, she did what the best scientists do—overturn the conventional wisdom with insightful thinking and rigorous defense. (Click the paper GIF images to enlarge).
After Profet won a MacArthur Foundation “genius” grant in 1993, Scientific American, The New York Times, and even Time Magazine swooned.
People Magazine featured her in the Shannen Doherty “secret wedding” issue. Elle covered her in a “Good Hair Day” edition. Harper’s Bazaar asked if she needed the magazine's hair and make-up artists for a photo shoot.
People Magazine featured her in the Shannen Doherty “secret wedding” issue. Elle covered her in a “Good Hair Day” edition. Harper’s Bazaar asked if she needed the magazine's hair and make-up artists for a photo shoot.
Profet’s
back story was irresistible—a small, soft-spoken, wisp of a woman born
of the southern California sun who wandered—almost dreamily, it
seemed—between
physics and philosophy, mastering each like a post-modern Renaissance
woman at places like Harvard and Berkeley, then publishing brilliant
biology papers with neither biology nor graduate degrees.
Her
free spirit enchanted leading journalists and her ideas intrigued the
best theoreticians, who found elegance in their sentence-long simplicity
and intuitive sensibilities.
Sperm, reproductive soldiers though they are, also carry hitchhiking germs. Menstruation
costs so much life-giving blood for a protective and life-saving
reason. Thanks to evolution, sneezing, menstrual bleeding, and
pregnancy-related nausea ward off toxins and disease. With these
“radical new views,” Profet had given ordinary annoyances, the New York Times said, “an active and salutary spin.”1 2 3 4 5
No comments:
Post a Comment